JP Cusick
New Member
Mr Know-it-all, sir.
Posts: 258 
|
Post by JP Cusick on Jul 8, 2011 10:55:11 GMT -5
The thing about the Casey Anthony trial is that the Prosecution and the Judge let into that trial ridiculous evidence as like a "smelling machine" that claimed to smell a dead body in the trunk of her car. And they let several witnesses testify of smelling a dead body in the car's trunk but how in the world would any of them know what a dead body smells like? Of course the Defense Attorney kept objecting and being over ruled as the Judge kept giving the Prosecution every thing it wanted to slander the character of the accused. Now after the trial there are reports that Casey had a Court appointed lawyer that was considered as being inexperienced (3 years) and a Latino too, so that he was expected to lose the case. The Prosecution had no murder weapon, no cause of death, no eye witness, no motive, nothing to convict Casey and yet they prosecuted and persecuted her anyway in a sham trial that backfired on their intentions. my own point is that this sort of process is not unusual in our Courts nationwide to railroad any accused citizen, not unusual at all but rather this is standard procedure by the book, with the only true exception being that Casey happened to be acquitted.  |
|
|
|
Post by Cindy on Jul 9, 2011 9:36:28 GMT -5
I just cant believe you didnt blame it on child support that the girl died because of child support and on and on .....
What happened did you miss it?
|
|
JP Cusick
New Member
Mr Know-it-all, sir.
Posts: 258
|
Post by JP Cusick on Jul 10, 2011 9:39:11 GMT -5
I just cant believe you didnt blame it on child support that the girl died because of child support and on and on .....
What happened did you miss it? I guess I must confess that if they had been getting the Child Support then the child might still be alive. Casey never told definitively who the father was and maybe she did not know for certain who was the father which means she was not getting any Child Support payments. If they (Casey and the grand parents) had been getting paid Child Support then they would have viewed the child as a money maker and some one would have held a higher value on the child as a money bag instead of a body bag. And the father might have been involved in his daughter's life including visitation and baby sitting but no. Apparently the mother had so little regard for her sperm donor that she never felt it to be necessary to inform the Dad that he was the father.  |
|
|
|
Post by citygirl on Jul 11, 2011 7:56:31 GMT -5
Thats crazy talk.
Casey Anthony did not kill Caylee because of not gettin child support. The absent father had nothing to do with it.
|
|
JP Cusick
New Member
Mr Know-it-all, sir.
Posts: 258
|
Post by JP Cusick on Jul 12, 2011 9:15:30 GMT -5
Casey Anthony did not kill Caylee because of not gettin child support. We really do not know if Casey did it or not, and she was found as "not guilty" so I give her the benefit of rightful doubt - as did the jury. As it turns out Casey's father the grandfather could have killed little Caylee, just as the grandmother could have done it too, so we just do not know what really happened as it could have been an accidental death as she said. The absent father had nothing to do with it. Since we do not know who the father of Caylee was then the father could have been involved with the death? Maybe the father worked on the swimming pool? or their auto mechanic? or maybe the father was the gardener? so we just do not know any of that either. |
|
|
|
Post by Cindy on Jul 13, 2011 7:02:07 GMT -5
Thats got nothing to do with child support.
|
|
|
|
Post by thunderclapp on Jul 13, 2011 7:20:51 GMT -5
Maybe the father worked on the swimming pool? or their auto mechanic? or maybe the father was the gardener? so we just do not know any of that either. Maybe Casey got away with murder? |
|
JP Cusick
New Member
Mr Know-it-all, sir.
Posts: 258
|
Post by JP Cusick on Jul 14, 2011 9:18:50 GMT -5
Thats got nothing to do with child support. The thing about Child Support as I pointed out in this case is that the Child Support turns the children into a commodity with a legal price tag attached for being bought and sold. People in the USA notoriously brag about their love and high regard for children while the Child Support and Custody laws do not align with that bragging. We simply can not help children by insulting, degrading and punishing their parents as is done by the Child Support and Custody laws. Casey Anthony was one of many (millions) of single mothers that our society insults and looks down onto just for having a child as single, and the law wants to know who the fathers are only so the law can then attack the fathers. It seems to me that our society pushes young people (boys and girls) to have sex, get abortions, use condoms, but not to have children because a child will mean that State laws will attack and even ruin both parents and their family. If a single parent as like Casey had sent her little Caylee to school then the school (under the law) will demand "who is the father", and if one applies for Welfare then the law demands "who is the father" or else the mother (or custodial Dad) will be denied public assistance, and the only reason the State law ask "who is the father" (or who is the Mom in some cases) is that the State laws will attack and degrade the other parent. So in our system parents ( both parents) and especially poor parents and poorer families are severely attacked and degraded just for having children, and especially for having poor children. This kind of inhumanity by our laws needs to be stopped, or else radically reformed. |
|
JP Cusick
New Member
Mr Know-it-all, sir.
Posts: 258
|
Post by JP Cusick on Jul 16, 2011 9:31:49 GMT -5
Maybe the father worked on the swimming pool? or their auto mechanic? or maybe the father was the gardener? so we just do not know any of that either. Maybe Casey got away with murder? The evidence against Casey did not and does not even show grounds for a manslaughter change, and not even evidence of simple child abuse or neglect - none. A presumption of guilt is not the same as a presumption of not-innocent. I say no one has a right to claim she is guilty, or a murderer, nor to imply such slander against her. |
|
|
|
Post by citygirl on Jul 17, 2011 10:11:16 GMT -5
People in the USA notoriously brag about their love and high regard for children while the Child Support and Custody laws do not align with that bragging. The child support and custody laws are there to help children! As if you dont know that!  |
|
