JP Cusick
New Member
Mr Know-it-all, sir.
Posts: 258
|
Post by JP Cusick on May 17, 2011 11:37:51 GMT -5
It seems important that I here declare that the resistance against the Child Support and its system is NOT against children and it is NOT against mothers and not against the custodial and not against families.
The problem is in the unjust and inhuman Child Support laws, so the resistance and the call for reform is in opposition to those unjust laws.
In fact it is believed and seen that the Child Support laws do hurt and harm the children and it hurts both the parents and hurts the custodial and the non custodial parent and it is detrimental to our society too.
Just FYI.
|
|
|
Post by PGC on May 23, 2011 21:24:48 GMT -5
Sighness youse stills a dumb (censored)
|
|
|
Post by bighoss on May 24, 2011 19:53:06 GMT -5
Only person it hurts is silly (censored) like you that don't want to pay support for the kids you brought into the world.
Too bad your old lady didn't have you pull out and blow loads over her face, xxxx, and (censored) so you won't have knocked her skanky (censored) up.
You need to xxxx xxx more or get a xxxx job. Perhaps that will make you stop acting like a (censored) tool.
|
|
JP Cusick
New Member
Mr Know-it-all, sir.
Posts: 258
|
Post by JP Cusick on Aug 15, 2011 8:02:45 GMT -5
It seems important that I here declare that the resistance against the Child Support and its system is NOT against children and it is NOT against mothers and not against the custodial and not against families. The problem is in the unjust and inhuman Child Support laws, so the resistance and the call for reform is in opposition to those unjust laws. In fact it is believed and seen that the Child Support laws do hurt and harm the children and it hurts both the parents and hurts the custodial and the non custodial parent and it is detrimental to our society too. Just FYI. A big reason for this problem is that Men / fathers do not fight back against the Women / the mother of their children. It is the thing as like the Woman can slap the Man while the Man is not to slap back. Women go to Court as if it were a sporting event where they think they are winning, while Men hate to put their dirty laundry (their personal business) out into the public exposure. Men will holler scream cuss and curse and some times go too far, but in the end against the Ladies the Men will usually punt or surrender to their Woman's demands. And it is not just the rich Men as every poor and homeless Man has their own sad tail of the Woman who took them down. The law and the Courts ignore this reality as they let the Woman / mother go into Court making any sort of pretentious claims and demands against the father, and then the law empowers that madness. Of course in some cases it is the father given custody and the mother being trashed by the laws, so yes some Men and some Women do not fit into the mold, but the law and the Courts do always trump into the some injustices in every case.
|
|
|
Post by thunderclapp on Aug 15, 2011 12:10:39 GMT -5
A big reason for this problem is that Men / fathers do not fight back against the Women / the mother of their children. It is the thing as like the Woman can slap the Man while the Man is not to slap back. ... Men will holler scream cuss and curse and some times go too far, but in the end against the Ladies the Men will usually punt or surrender to their Woman's demands. That was more carefully stated than when you said it on the Baltimore Sun Talk Forum on January 9, 2010. When you said "We" in that statement, did it mean that you, JP Cusick, Sr. , sometimes smacked your wife? Did you ever smack your wife?
|
|
JP Cusick
New Member
Mr Know-it-all, sir.
Posts: 258
|
Post by JP Cusick on Aug 16, 2011 9:18:13 GMT -5
That was more carefully stated than when you said it on the Baltimore Sun Talk Forum on January 9, 2010. I always do try to improve from day to day. And from year to year. That is the point of life and the purpose of living - to improve our self and to help improve everything else. When you said "We" in that statement, did it mean that you, JP Cusick, Sr. , sometimes smacked your wife? Did you ever smack your wife? I surely am not going to fall into any such personal affront, but I do say that in cases where a couple gets physically fighting then that is the time for the police to intervene, but the police have no business of intervening based on the parents loving their children or not, as is affronted by the Child Support and Custody laws. There is a big difference in having a rude punk who steps in where they do not belong, as opposed to the brute force of law enforcement stepping into families and into parenting where it does not belong.
|
|
|
Post by thunderclapp on Aug 18, 2011 5:19:47 GMT -5
Did you ever smack your wife? I surely am not going to fall into any such personal affront, but I do say that in cases where a couple gets physically fighting then that is the time for the police to intervene, but the police have no business of intervening based on the parents loving their children or not, as is affronted by the Child Support and Custody laws. There is a big difference in having a rude punk who steps in where they do not belong, as opposed to the brute force of law enforcement stepping into families and into parenting where it does not belong. So you won't answer the question? For some reason you can't just answer this question by just saying "No". It's not like I asked "When did you stop beating your wife". I really thought you would answer it. You said... forums.somd.com/elections/106484-solution-c-s-5.html#post2226806 This is very revealing. 'nuff said.
|
|
JP Cusick
New Member
Mr Know-it-all, sir.
Posts: 258
|
Post by JP Cusick on Aug 21, 2011 8:38:35 GMT -5
It seems important that I here declare that the resistance against the Child Support and its system is NOT against children and it is NOT against mothers and not against the custodial and not against families. The problem is in the unjust and inhuman Child Support laws, so the resistance and the call for reform is in opposition to those unjust laws. In fact it is believed and seen that the Child Support laws do hurt and harm the children and it hurts both the parents and hurts the custodial and the non custodial parent and it is detrimental to our society too. Just FYI. The point remains that the Child Support resistance is only against the law, as it is not against the Custodial parents and not against the children. I am against the law = ha ha ha ha ha ....
|
|
|
Post by kiteboardgurl on Jan 5, 2012 21:15:40 GMT -5
I Just wanted to say that I have experienced this child support BS on both sides as a daughter of a WONDERFUL man who raised my brother and I on his own and I who now have a beautiful little woman running around and also raising her on my own. In the case of my father, they divorced after 20 years and the military has been sending her half of his retirement since 1999 while she managed to disappear long enough that a court summons was never reached to her, which would have in the end of been $300.00 a month AT THE MOST while she was still raking in $1,000.00 a month + full benefits But she to this day hasn't payed a dime in support and I haven't seen her for 17 years. My brother and I grew up Just fine because my father GOT OFF HIS *** and did everything he could as a single parent to make sure we had the basics and also got his Bachelors degree!
As for the BLOOD SUCKERS I understand a person may go through hardships and can't find work and the government and social workers are going to protect them and their farm of children from starvation and homelessness until they can GET IT TOGETHER but to raise your children their ENTIRE life while they view YOU depending on others to put food in their mouths and pay your bills!, Bashing the other parent in front of the kids about how you cant pay the bills because of them, COME ON! what type of examples are we teaching our babies! this may not be the deal for all but I have witnessed so many cases of baby mommas out for blood and they don't think about the stability of the father or the consequences of the fathers loosing their licenses and going to jail, DUH THAT MEANS NO MONEY STUPID. As for the previously " Married with a couple of kids" Two story home, Big Yard, Nice Cars....well if your a house wife or father well you better think real hard on how your gonna pay the mortgage and utility bills if you want to live in it with your kids, That support payment is most of the time the only thing keeping people from loosing their house or car and its irresponsible to live like that. If your bills are too much after a divorce then downsize. That support payment should be going straight into a college fund. Yeah Yeah that's not how it is for everyone but Its up to you what your life is like. There is just TOO MANY Hand outs to not get your life right!!! you shouldn't depend on ANYONE but yourself because one day that's all there might be. Now for me, my baby's father and I had a young love and I was stupid and so was he we BOTH had unprotected sex and when we broke up I found out later that I had a serious decision to make. He was for abortion and so was I until the last Minuit. That's when I told him the rules, He could be in the babies life and help or sign birth rights over. He had good intention at first but slowly began to drift away. The thought of this man drifting in and out of my child's life as he pleased and not contributing made no sense to me. Needless to say He signed over the birth rights mean while I joined the Navy, and going to school and My princess and I are happier than ever. JP I am on your side for sure! I recently got married and since then my hubby has been through the wringer especially since she found out about us getting married and me being in the service. She really is trying to get him for our dual income now... Jeez whats going through her worthless head?
|
|
|
Post by kiteboardgurl on Jan 5, 2012 21:26:43 GMT -5
Oh and I im talking about my husbands child's mother. He has payments taken out of his check every week, and she's still not happy and very reluctant to let the child come over to our house
|
|