JP Cusick
New Member
Mr Know-it-all, sir.
Posts: 258 
|
Post by JP Cusick on Aug 6, 2011 10:07:24 GMT -5
Well for starters you obviously do not understand the meaning of sarcasm. What the heck was that? You are correct that I do not understand sarcasm at all. Neither coming nor going. 2nd, what part of the fact that a staggering number of single parents are so because they have been ABANDONED by their children's other parent who THEY WERE MARRIED TO, don't you understand? There is no moral gray area in these cases. No sinister plans to breed for profit off some unsuspecting schmo who thinks birth control is being used. I do not really blame either parent as I blame the ignorant laws which have no business stepping in between the parents. Now I say I have been too harsh with you and too hard on that "Singles" forum, because the "Law Enforcement Officers" group booted me off of its forum too for the same reason. So when even our Police Officers do not have the stomach to face up to the reality then I have no right to expect any more from the "Singles" website forum. The thing is that the Divorce laws, the Child Support and Custody laws are NOT your friends, the laws are like poison which harms the custodial, hurts the non custodial parents, hurts the children by alienating their parents, and the ignorant laws hurt our society. It is like the infamous "Monkey Trap", link HERE and HERE, because if our society would just let go of the ignorant laws then there would be freedom and parents could get on with their life, and with their parenting. The children do not need the Divorce laws, the children do not need the Child Support or Custody laws, what every child does need is unrestricted access to both of their natural biological parents (both their real Mom and real Dad) whether their parents are rich or dirt poor, and this is the true reason why Police Officers can not face up to the what is going on with the law, and it is why the custodial parents break down under scrutiny, because they are in the wrong. The Child Support and Custody laws are morally wrong, ethically wrong, legally wrong and humanly wrong, and those laws are destructive to all concerned.  |
|
|
|
Post by Awitness on Aug 7, 2011 13:16:55 GMT -5
No, JP, the child custody and support laws just rained on your little personal parade.
I can stomach the truth just fine.
I can see right and wrong just fine.
I can see that all situations have variations and different circumstances and different methods of managing them must be employed.
You need not concern yourself with being too "hard on me"...your emotional growth and ability for personal insight is so stunted that being "chastised" by you is rather like having a child inform me about how the world works from his viewpoint.
"Rules are bad and I should be able to do whatever I want, whenever I want, and if you disagree then you are wrong!"
But, of course, you will argue about it all day if I continue to participate.
When a child does this it's amusing. From you it's just sad.
Seems like that attitude is what cost YOUR children their father.
Seriously, have you ever been diagnosed? You unquestionably have some severe issues with your mental health. Your narcissism is possibly the most extreme I have ever seen.
Thank you, Thunderclapp, for your insight into the history of this... person.
I have to wonder what keeps you hanging around this place much as I wonder why I feel the urge to drop by to see the latest rantings.
Has a "watching a train wreck" feel to it but without the horrible aftermath.
JP, I do honestly pity you. I hope for your sake that you garner enough attention (without hurting anyone else) that some help is finally forced upon you.
Your illusions of grandure are bad enough to be considered psychotic. There are meds that can help with that.
|
|
JP Cusick
New Member
Mr Know-it-all, sir.
Posts: 258
|
Post by JP Cusick on Aug 8, 2011 7:19:00 GMT -5
No, JP, the child custody and support laws just rained on your little personal parade. JP, I do honestly pity you. I hope for your sake that you garner enough attention (without hurting anyone else) that some help is finally forced upon you. Your illusions of grandure are bad enough to be considered psychotic. There are meds that can help with that. When I enter the US Senate and the reforms take place then your kind will understand and comply. Real sheep do not have any specific shepherd as they just do whatever and go wherever anyone directs them.  |
|
The Public Concern Assoc
Guest
|
Post by The Public Concern Assoc on Aug 9, 2011 7:05:39 GMT -5
 There are many pills and rooms for those that suffer from Disillusions of Grandeur - But hey your moms sweet for telling you that.
|
|
|
|
Post by thunderclapp on Aug 9, 2011 7:44:09 GMT -5
When I enter the US Senate and the reforms take place then your kind will understand and comply.One thing I'll say for you is that I always did think you had a good sense of humor. It's your " idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality, typically a symptom of mental disorder" oxforddictionaries.com/definition/delusion?region=us that trumps all of your other character "traits". |
|
JP Cusick
New Member
Mr Know-it-all, sir.
Posts: 258
|
Post by JP Cusick on Aug 10, 2011 8:45:02 GMT -5
Your illusions of grandure are bad enough to be considered psychotic. There are meds that can help with that.  There are many pills and rooms for those that suffer from Disillusions of Grandeur - But hey your moms sweet for telling you that. It's your " idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality, typically a symptom of mental disorder" oxforddictionaries.com/definition/delusion?region=us that trumps all of your other character "traits". In my case as in this case then I really am a legally registered 2012 candidate for the US Senate being recognized by both State and Federal election laws, and if I do get elected then I surely will work to reform the ignorant Child Support and Custody laws, which means there is nothing "delusional" about what I am posting. But here you and the others above are presenting your selves as if you each were Doctors or Psychiatrist throwing out some medical diagnosis with no basis except your opposition to me. If the law or your selves were correct in the case of Child Support then there would be no need to attack the messenger who tells that the Child Support is wrong. This is the same reason that the Gov and the laws slander and demonize the parents as "deadbeats" because the laws are wrong and the c/s system is evil. One thing I'll say for you is that I always did think you had a good sense of humor. Seems odd that is this case you miss the humor of it still. |
|
|
|
Post by thunderclapp on Aug 10, 2011 10:01:08 GMT -5
In my case as in this case then I really am a legally registered 2012 candidate for the US Senate being recognized by both State and Federal election laws, and if I do get elected then I surely will work to reform the ignorant Child Support and Custody laws, which means there is nothing "delusional" about what I am posting. If you had said IF, there would be no comment. But you said WHEN, Dr. Schuller. But here you and the others above are presenting your selves as if you each were Doctors or Psychiatrist throwing out some medical diagnosis with no basis except your opposition to me. There was no diagnosis, it was a definition. But here is one from a real Psychiatrist... "Mr. Cusick, who was diagnosed during a psychiatric evaluation as having a personality disorder
with excessive/compulsive traits, requested a jury trial but had no attorney.
He denied having any mental illness, but when asked by Judge Lerner when he would stop
vandalizing buildings, he did not give an answer after pondering the question for several seconds.
Ms. Prigge requested Mr. Cusick be incarcerated, saying there's no indication his antisocial
behavior will cease. She speculated his dislike of child support laws stems from the time he spent in
jail in 1995 for failure to pay support. Source: Brian M Schleter, The Capital Online Archive, HometownAnnapolis.com As far as "attacking the messenger" goes, the problem is that it is well documented that the messenger... 1)...is a deadbeat seeking revenge for having being incarcerated after wandering from state to state in order to avoid paying child support. 2)...removed himself from his son's life, totally neglecting him 3)...was incarcerated for vandalizing government property All of which the "messenger" brought upon himself and now claims to be a victim, a former "political prisoner" and a spokesman for child support reform. Child Support Reform! You didn't even support your own child and you want to be a spokesman for Child Support Reform! You don't want to reform Child Support laws, you want to abolish the laws and fire everyone on the payroll that has anything to do with Child Support enforcement. |
|
JP Cusick
New Member
Mr Know-it-all, sir.
Posts: 258
|
Post by JP Cusick on Aug 12, 2011 10:08:05 GMT -5
A GOOD MORAL parent WANTS to support their child and has no qualms about paying support. Often pays more than what is ordered. A GOOD MORAL parent gets visitation with their children...whether the other parent likes it or not. It is ordered just like the cs is. Children cannot be stolen from a GOOD MORAL parent. Parenting truly is not a matter of "morality" as you are claiming, and human parents have natural and instinctive parenting traits as does wild animals - in that human parents all want to have healthy and happy children, unless the parent is mentally disturbed or some other dysfunction which are out of this topic. Parents raise their children based on their own morality and rightly so, but just being a parent is just a normal human body function and not some act of morality. What I see done in the quote above is a self-righteous stance, as if they are the superior parents punishing the inferior parents based only on the amount of cash money being extorted as the so called Child Support. The Child Support and Custody laws are legalized stealing and kidnapping, and to accept the Child Support is to live off of ill-gotten stolen money, and those are the true violations of real morals. The immoral self righteousness is by claiming your self as the better parent then the less fortunate separated parents - and you are not better. The thing we need to do as a society and as our laws is to start providing ways which preserve the family unit, and protect married parents, and stop attacking parents. |
|
|
|
Post by citygirl on Aug 14, 2011 10:08:55 GMT -5
The thing we need to do as a society and as our laws is to start providing ways which preserve the family unit, and protect married parents, and stop attacking parents. We protect custodial parents because the CP is the one who has the child. |
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Mar 20, 2012 18:00:31 GMT -5
JP"As in example: even if the separated parent is gone and disappeared or remarried and unloving, then the children are still to be taught to respect and to honor their separated parent anyway as that is the duty of custody to raise the children as healthy as possible."
Taught to respect?? Funny. Kids grow up, kids see things, kids are smart.
You got issues, big issues.
The sentence that made me check this place out, find the thread and reply was something to the fact of you comparing a man giving a woman a car, and yet sh expects him to fill it with gas; to the have a baby and she expect him to be financially responsible for it.
JP "If I gave a woman a brand new car would she cry about having to put gasoline into the car? hell no, but if a Man gives a woman a brand new baby then she cries because she has to feed her own child. The car is seen as a blessing while the child is claimed to be a burden."
Did the man not help?? Was he not there during conception.
Yea,huge issues.
I feel sorry and worrisome for any woman that ever involves herself with you intimately.
Reading your posts, your issues with women in general really shine.
The custodial parent does have more responsibilities, ya know why, because the court saw them as the more responsible adult.
I dont know what else to say. Your ignorance, thou well hid amongst words, phrases and attacks, shine through very clearly.
I know a lot of great dads that pay their child support, willingly, no court order as well as some great moms that do the same.
If you dont like any forums "ways" of doing things or the members in it~as you said, there is always the internet.
Can't fix stupid.
If I ever see anywhere your name on a ballot~I will not be marking that box.
Leave the judgements for the only Judge that matters.
|
|
There are many pills and rooms for those that suffer from Disillusions of Grandeur - But hey your moms sweet for telling you that. 